
Recent Posts
Archives
 February 2019
 November 2018
 March 2018
 March 2016
 February 2016
 January 2016
 October 2015
 September 2015
 August 2015
 July 2015
 June 2015
 May 2015
 March 2015
 February 2015
 November 2013
 September 2013
 July 2013
 June 2013
 April 2013
 March 2013
 January 2013
 November 2012
 October 2012
 July 2012
 June 2012
 May 2012
 April 2012
 March 2012
 February 2012
 January 2012
 December 2011
 November 2011
 October 2011
 September 2011
 August 2011
 July 2011
 June 2011
 May 2011
 April 2011
 March 2011
 February 2011
 January 2011
 December 2010
 November 2010
 October 2010
 September 2010
 August 2010
 July 2010
Categories
Meta
Tag Archives: equivalence classes
[G]eometry and number[s]…are unified by the concept of a coordinate system, which allows one to convert geometric objects to numeric ones or vice versa. … [O]ne can view the length ❘AB❘ of a line segment AB not as a number … Continue reading
[T]he point of introducing L^p spaces in the first place is … to exploit … Banach space. For instance, if one has ƒ − g = 0, one would like to conclude that ƒ = g. But because of the … Continue reading
Leonardo da Vinci’s ability to embrace uncertainty, ambiguity, and paradox was a critical characteristic of his genius. —J Michael Gelb Say you want to use a mathematical metaphor, but you don’t want to be really precise. Here are some ways … Continue reading
Do numbers exist?
When I was a math teacher some curious students (Fez and Andrew) asked, “Does i, √−1, exist? Does infinity ∞ exist?” I told this story. You explain to me what 4 is by pointing to four rocks on the ground, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged ℝ, √−1, ∞, complex numbers, education, equivalence class, equivalence classes, i, imaginary numbers, math, mathematics, maths, philosophy, science, why, Willard van Orman Quine
Leave a comment