Is there really such a thing as a point? Well, not really….

  • Ask any of our undergraduates, why the real numbers? Can you say there’s something √π centimetres away from here?
    —Well, not really, it’s an approximation….
    —An approximation to what?
  • “We’re not really doing science. We don’t have any data, so we’re just indulging our own mathematical and philosophical prejudices. :)”
  • “If a pile of papers appeared on your desk and claimed to be the correct theory of quantum gravity, how would you know?”
  • “All of the standard formulations of quantum theory, whether it’s

    whatever you want — all of them more or less presuppose the use of standard real numbers. That’s one issue I find very problematic. … That seems to me very dubious.” 

  • Heidegger asked, What is a thing? And answered, on page ~60, A thing is the bearer of properties.
  • From Heidegger’s perspective, there is no ”way that things are”. (due to the Kochen-Specker theorem)

Slides here.

About isomorphismes

Argonaut: someone engaged in a dangerous but potentially rewarding adventure.
Video | This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s