Work less. Spend less. Live more.

—chalked on a sidewalk at my college, years ago

I was reading economics at the time, so it made a lot of sense to cast the preference in terms of isoutility curves. As long as the level curves of 𝓤 over (consumption, leisure) space are sufficiently close to parallel the consumption axis, the above suggestion is rational, even optimal.

In terms of partial derivatives, 𝓤 / ∂leisure > ∂𝓤 / consumption at many points in (consumption, leisure) space. More to the point, the directional gradient along the budget constraint points leisureward even at the expense of consumption, for a meaningfully large fraction of the segment.

Advertisements

About isomorphismes

Argonaut: someone engaged in a dangerous but potentially rewarding adventure.
Quote | This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s