1729 is not a number

SOURCE: Barry Mazur, When Is One Thing Equal to Some Other Thing?

Anyone who writes a number in the form 1729 implies a method of calculation: one thousand, plus seven hundreds, plus two tens, plus nine ones.

& underline{texttt{1729}}  \ &  1 cdot 1000 \ + &  7 cdot 100 \ + &  2 cdot 10 \ + &  9 cdot 1 \

Different than writing tick-marks |||||||||||||||||||||||…¹⁷²⁹ which would imply

underbrace{1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1+  ldots}_{text{1729 times}}

Different than Roman numerals MDCCXXIX,

&  ; underline{texttt{M!;!D!;!C!;!C!;!X!;!X!I!X}}  \ &  ; 1 cdot 1000 \ + &  ; 1 cdot 500 \ + &  ;2 cdot 100 \ + &  ; 2 cdot 10 \ - &  ; 1 cdot 1 \ + &  ; 1 cdot 10

hexadecimal 6C1,

&  ; underline{texttt{6C1}}  \ &  ; 6 cdot 256 \ + &  ; 12 cdot 16 \ + &  ; 1 cdot 1 \

or the most agnostic way to write a number, via its prime factorization ”the fourth prime ⨯ the sixth prime ⨯ the eighth prime”.

p_4 cdot p_6 cdot p_8 text{   i.e.,  } 7 cdot 13 cdot 19

They’re all ways of calculating the number, but they’re not the number itself.

Daphne

We could agree to call this number some agreed-upon name, like ”Daphne” and use a symbol ₯ for shorthand. 1729 is no more her name than is 6C1.

Or we could refer to Daphne by property without implying a particular calculation: “the smallest sum of two cubes, which can be written two different ways”.

Or we could denote Daphne by equation:

  • ₯ = 9^3 + 10^3, or
  • Daphne ₯ is the number that solves the equation 12^3 – ₯ = 1^3.

It’s the same way with the square root of two. Its name is no more √2 than ⨿2 or ¶2.

Just like 1729√2 is merely a notation. What makes √2 be √2 is the property it has.

Numbers aren’t numerals, they’re … uh … things.

All of the above is meant to drive a wedge between numbers as written on paper and numbers as they “exist” abstractly.

the algebraic numbers in the complex plane, coloured by degree

Numbers don’t need numerals. And you can talk about numbers without knowing how to write them. Just agree on some symbol like π and use π whenever you want to talk about the number you don’t know how to write.

It sounds trivial talking about an integer, but the difference between

  • properties of numbers,
  •  ways to calculate numbers, and
  • the numbers themselves

is good to keep in mind when you’re thinking deeply about

Advertisements

About isomorphismes

Argonaut: someone engaged in a dangerous but potentially rewarding adventure.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s